Australia: Directors and Officers

Subscribe
Business law and corporate law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering topics that involve business and corporate law produced by specialists working in this area every day.
Article
Personal Guarantees In Commercial Leases: Risks For Directors
Directors who sign retail leases on behalf of company tenants often provide personal guarantees without fully understanding the scope of their liability. This liability can extend far beyond unpaid rent to include outgoings, interest, make-good costs, and enforcement expenses, persisting even after resignation or business sale. Understanding the distinction between guarantees and indemnities, and knowing when statutory protections may apply, is essential for directors seeking to limit their personal exposur
Australia Real Estate
SL
Stonegate Legal
Article
AI Governance Is A Board Issue: Are You Equipped To Answer The Tough Questions?
As artificial intelligence becomes deeply embedded in organisational operations and decision-making, boards face a critical governance challenge: could they explain and defend their AI use if called before a regulator or Royal Commission tomorrow? This article examines why AI governance has become a board-level issue and what evidence organisations would need to produce under regulatory scrutiny.
Australia Commercial
PA
Piper Alderman
Article
Stepping-Stone Claims: The Next Wave Of Director Liability In Australia
Australian directors face a new frontier of personal liability through "stepping-stone" claims, where shareholders use a company's regulatory breach as the foundation to pursue directors for failing to prevent corporate wrongdoing. This emerging litigation strategy, backed by well-funded private litigants, threatens to expose directors to penalties worth tens of millions of dollars, fundamentally reshaping the risk landscape for corporate governance in Australia.
Australia Commercial
PA
Piper Alderman
Article
Shareholder Oppression - Protecting Your Rights As A Shareholder
When you invest your time, money and energy into a company, you expect to be treated fairly and to have your rights as a shareholder respected. But what happens when those rights are ignored, or worse, actively undermined? Shareholder oppression is a serious issue that can have significant financial implications. If you suspect that your rights are being compromised, it’s important to act promptly to protect your interests.
Australia Commercial
BP
Bartier Perry
Article
The Duty Of Care And Diligence For Directors And Officers - Lessons From ASIC v Bekier
A Federal Court decision has found that two senior executives of The Star Entertainment Group breached their statutory duty of care and diligence by failing to properly escalate serious legal and regulatory risks related to junket operations and payment card misuse. The case establishes critical precedents for how executive directors, company secretaries, and in-house counsel must exercise oversight in high-risk industries, particularly when warning signs of potential criminal activity emerge.
Australia Commercial
BP
Bartier Perry
Article
Mobile Asset Minority Shareholder Successfully Challenges Drag-along Provisions Before The Takeovers Panel
In Mobile Asset Holdings Ltd [2026] ATP 7, the Takeovers Panel considered a situation where the Board, directors of which represented 50%+ of the shareholdings in the company, put a resolution to shareholders for a constitutional amendment which would enable them to compel all shareholders to sell their shares (aka drag-along rights) without the usual guardrails. This blank cheque approval request was most likely going to be approved, given the voting majority who benefited from it were themselves voting, but for the successful application to the Takeovers Panel of an individual applicant.
Australia Commercial
KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Article
Some Lessons From The Humm Situation
When a takeover proposal is received, the board must rigorously assess whether any director has a personal interest that could be affected by the outcome of the proposal. If there is any reasonable perception of a lack of independence — even if the director believes they can act impartially — that director should be excluded from the board's consideration of the matter and an independent board committee should be formed.
Australia Commercial
KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
See more