Australia: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
When Are Pleadings Closed In Queensland?
Queensland's Uniform Civil Procedure Rules establish specific triggers for when pleadings close in civil proceedings, with significant implications for disclosure obligations and the scope of evidence parties may present. Understanding whether closure occurs 14 days after defence service or immediately upon reply service determines critical procedural deadlines and shapes the strategic decisions parties must make about responding to new allegations raised in opposing pleadings.
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
Article
No Reasons Required: Supreme Court Reinforces The Limits Of Medical Panel Judicial Review
The Victorian Supreme Court has ruled on the procedural framework governing Medical Panel referrals under the Wrongs Act, addressing whether multiple respondents can separately refer identical medical questions to different panels and whether subsequent panels must reconcile their findings with earlier determinations. The decision in Baressi v Cross Yarra Partnerships & Ors clarifies the independence of Medical Panel assessments and the limited grounds available for judicial review of their determinations.
Australia Litigation
K
Kennedys
See more
Article
When Are Pleadings Closed In Queensland?
Queensland's Uniform Civil Procedure Rules establish specific triggers for when pleadings close in civil proceedings, with significant implications for disclosure obligations and the scope of evidence parties may present. Understanding whether closure occurs 14 days after defence service or immediately upon reply service determines critical procedural deadlines and shapes the strategic decisions parties must make about responding to new allegations raised in opposing pleadings.
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
Article
The Harman Undertaking In Queensland
The Harman undertaking, more accurately termed the implied obligation in Australia, automatically restricts how documents and information obtained through compulsory court processes may be used beyond their original proceeding. This obligation binds parties, solicitors, experts, and others who receive such material, covering disclosed documents, interrogatory answers, subpoenaed materials, affidavits and witness statements.
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
See more
See more
Article
When Are Pleadings Closed In Queensland?
Queensland's Uniform Civil Procedure Rules establish specific triggers for when pleadings close in civil proceedings, with significant implications for disclosure obligations and the scope of evidence parties may present. Understanding whether closure occurs 14 days after defence service or immediately upon reply service determines critical procedural deadlines and shapes the strategic decisions parties must make about responding to new allegations raised in opposing pleadings.
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
Article
No Reasons Required: Supreme Court Reinforces The Limits Of Medical Panel Judicial Review
The Victorian Supreme Court has ruled on the procedural framework governing Medical Panel referrals under the Wrongs Act, addressing whether multiple respondents can separately refer identical medical questions to different panels and whether subsequent panels must reconcile their findings with earlier determinations. The decision in Baressi v Cross Yarra Partnerships & Ors clarifies the independence of Medical Panel assessments and the limited grounds available for judicial review of their determinations.
Australia Litigation
K
Kennedys
See more
Article
Flexible Work Requests – Lessons For The APS
Recent Australian Public Service census data reveals a growing trend in flexible work arrangements, supported by new enterprise agreement provisions. Two landmark Fair Work Commission decisions in Naden and Westpac now provide critical guidance on how employers must handle flexible work requests, highlighting the mandatory requirements and potential consequences of non-compliance that could result in orders granting employee requests even when business grounds exist for refusal.
Australia Employment
HR
Holding Redlich
See more