ARTICLE
23 May 2014

Top 5 Civil Appeals from the Court of Appeal (Video Companion - May 2014)

LL
Lerners LLP

Contributor

Lerners LLP is one of Southwestern Ontario’s largest law firms with offices in London, Toronto, Waterloo Region, and Strathroy. Ours is a history of over 90 years of successful client service and representation. Today we are more than 140 exceptionally skilled lawyers with abundant experience in litigation and dispute resolution(including class actions, appeals, and arbitration/mediation,) corporate/commercial law, health law, insurance law, real estate, employment law, personal injury and family law.
Lerners LLP Partner, Brian Radnoff, summarizes the Top 5 Decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal from March 2014.
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Lerners LLP Partner, Brian Radnoff, summarizes the Top 5 Decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal from May 2014.


1. Di Michele v. Di Michele, 2014 ONCA 261 (CanLII) - Court of Appeal speaking to the power of an estate trustee to mortgage property

2. Lavoie v. T.A. McGill Mortgage Services Inc., 2014 ONCA 257 (CanLII) - Ontario Court of Appeal voids a professional liability insurance policy for misrepresentations at the time the policy was arranged.

3. R & G Draper Farms (Keswick) Ltd. v. 1758691 Ontario Inc., 2014 ONCA 278 (CanLII) - Ontario Court of Appeal considered which of two Arbitration Acts applied to an arbitration that the parties had undertaken. It mattered because each act had a different limitation period governing when proceedings could be launched in Court to challenge the arbitration decision.

4. Bondy v. London (City), 2014 ONCA 291 (CanLII) - Court of Appeal considered the issues of the standard of care owed by municipalities in relation to road maintenance is elevated in relation to a public highway which has pedestrian traffic. The Court of Appeal found that it was not elevated on that basis.

5. Verch Estate v. Weckwerth [2014] O.J. No. 2092 - The Ontario Court of Appeal considered whether beneficiaries who were not dependents of the testator at the time of his death, and had been excluded from a will could make a claim against the assets of the estate and concluded that there was no moral obligation on the testator to provide for people who were not dependents.

http://lernersappeals.ca/netletters

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More