ARTICLE
20 February 2026

Read The Fine Print: An Authorization Clause Rescues A Creditor's Lapsed $1 Million Agricultural Security Interest In Bankruptcy Court

Aa
Adams and Reese

Contributor

At Adams & Reese, we take things personally. Our people are connected – to each other, to our clients, our families, and our communities. Our industry-focused practice groups of attorneys and advisors are strategically organized throughout the southern U.S. and Washington, DC.

Adams & Reese professionals are known as practical and personal advisors and advocates who tailor their approach and counsel to the specific needs of each situation and client. Many on our team have years of on-the-job experience within the industries that we serve as executives, professionals, and in-house counsel. Taking a hands-on, personal approach to every issue, challenge and opportunity our clients face, Adams & Reese lawyers and advisors are skilled and ready to help clients achieve their goals and make their lives easier.

A recent bankruptcy opinion delivers welcome news for secured creditors: Even if a financing statement lapses, a creditor can re-perfect its security interest by filing a new financing statement...
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Adams and Reese are most popular:
  • within Technology topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Environment & Waste Management industries

A recent bankruptcy opinion delivers welcome news for secured creditors: Even if a financing statement lapses, a creditor can re-perfect its security interest by filing a new financing statement—so long as the underlying security agreement provides the authorization to do so. 

In this case, a dairy farmer obtained credit facilities from the creditor's predecessor-in-interest in 2009 and 2010, securing the loans with agricultural liens. The creditor's predecessor had filed financing statements, which, at the time, were valid for ten years. But when the successor lender acquired the loan in 2017, it filed amendments to reflect the assignment, but did not file continuation statements before the financing statements expired. After realizing the financing statements had lapsed, the lender filed new financing statements in June of 2021. 

The debtor later filed for Chapter 12 bankruptcy and challenged the lender's roughly $1 million secured claim, arguing that the lender improperly filed a new financing statement without the debtor's consent after the original statements had lapsed. The debtor contended that the 2021 financing statement was invalid, and thus the creditor was unsecured.

The bankruptcy court disagreed, holding that the security agreements between the parties explicitly authorized the creditor to "execute and file on its own with the Department of State … a continuation statement" as well as "any other statement permitted by the Commercial Transactions Law … at any time it deems appropriate." The Court concluded that this broad language authorized the creditor to file a brand-new financing statement after the original one expired—not merely a continuation statement.

The ruling underscores the critical importance of the authorization language in security agreements. Creditors should ensure that security agreements explicitly grant them the authority to file financing statements, continuation statements, and "any other" filings permitted by applicable law at any time and without debtor consent.

The decision is In re Eschevarria, 24-01404 (Bankr. D. Puerto Rico Feb. 5, 2026).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More