ARTICLE
24 March 2026

FTC Eyes New Rulemaking On Hidden Fees In Rental Housing

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On March 12, the FTC took a significant step toward regulating rental housing fees, issuing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)...
United States Real Estate and Construction
A.J. Dhaliwal’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence industries
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On March 12, the FTC took a significant step toward regulating rental housing fees, issuing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) seeking public comment on whether it should adopt a rule under Section 18 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The proposed rule would target unfair or deceptive rental housing fee practices, with a particular focus on fees that may obscure the true cost of rental housing from application through moveout. Comments on the ANPRM are due by April 13, 2026.

The ANPRM identifies a broad range of potentially problematic fee practices. Among them: advertised rent that excludes mandatory fees or charges, fees imposed without express informed consent, and representations that may mislead consumers about the nature, purpose, amount, refundability, optionality, or recurrence of charges. The FTC also seeks input on practices involving application fees, security deposits, billing issues, and conduct that may impede consumer choice — such as requiring renters to use certain service providers. According to the agency, these practices can make comparison shopping more difficult, increase consumer search costs, and ultimately weaken price competition among housing providers.

Notably, the ANPRM signals that the FTC is looking beyond upfront advertised rent to fee practices across the full lease lifecycle. The Commission pointed to its recent enforcement actions against large housing providers as examples of alleged hidden-fee conduct, while acknowledging that case-by-case enforcement alone may not be sufficient to address the breadth of the issue across the rental housing market. A formal rule, the agency suggests, could serve as a stronger deterrent by enabling it to seek civil penalties and more readily obtain consumer redress.

Putting It Into Practice: This ANPRM is consistent with the FTC's broader push for pricing transparency and its ongoing scrutiny of allegedly deceptive fee practices (previously discussed here). For rental housing providers, property managers, listing platforms, and related service providers, now is the time to evaluate how rent and mandatory charges are advertised, when and how fees are disclosed, and whether consumer consent practices hold up to increasing regulatory expectations. Stakeholders may also wish to consider submitting comments during the public comment period to help shape the scope of any future rule.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More