ARTICLE
9 June 2025

FDIC And Maryland End Joint Consent Orders Against Regional Bank

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On April 7, the FDIC and the Maryland Office of Financial Regulation terminated two consent orders against a regional bank headquartered in Maryland.
United States Maryland Government, Public Sector
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On April 7, the FDIC and the Maryland Office of Financial Regulation terminated two consent orders against a regional bank headquartered in Maryland.The termination concludes joint federal and state enforcement actions that required the bank to remediate deficiencies in its anti-money laundering (AML) program, interest rate risk management, and consumer protection practices.

The now-terminated 2022 and 2024 orders stemmed from examinations that identified significant deficiencies in the bank's AML program, oversight of interest rate risk, corporate governance, and consumer credit disclosures.The bank allegedly provided misleading disclosures in connection with a consumer credit product involving a third-party lender, raising UDAAP concerns.The orders imposed broad corrective obligations, including:

  • Remediation of AML compliance failures.The bank was required to implement a revised risk-based AML/CFT program, enhance suspicious activity monitoring, strengthen customer due diligence procedures, review prior transactions, and validate its transaction monitoring system. The order also mandated board-level compliance oversight and the establishment of a dedicated OFAC compliance program.
  • Risk management and governance reforms.The order directed improvements to board supervision, succession planning, and internal audit responsiveness.The bank was required to establish a risk management framework with metrics for capital, liquidity, asset growth, and concentration risk.
  • Liquidity and capital planning enhancements. The bank had to submit revised capital and liquidity plans, including scenario-based testing, contingency funding strategies, and funding diversification.

Putting It Into Practice: The termination of these consent orders reflects a continued federal pullback from enforcement actions initiated under the prior administration (previously discussed here and here). While federal regulators may be retreating, state agencies and the FTC have demonstrated ongoing interest in policing the financial services industry (previously discussed here and here).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More