Australia: Personal Injury

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
No Reasons Required: Supreme Court Reinforces The Limits Of Medical Panel Judicial Review
The Victorian Supreme Court has ruled on the procedural framework governing Medical Panel referrals under the Wrongs Act, addressing whether multiple respondents can separately refer identical medical questions to different panels and whether subsequent panels must reconcile their findings with earlier determinations. The decision in Baressi v Cross Yarra Partnerships & Ors clarifies the independence of Medical Panel assessments and the limited grounds available for judicial review of their determinations.
Australia Litigation
K
Kennedys
Article
Section 22 PIPA Requests In Queensland Personal Injury Claims: A Strategic Tool For Early Claim Resolution
Queensland's Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 provides respondents with a powerful strategic tool through section 22 requests for information. When properly deployed, these requests can expose weaknesses in causation and credibility, lock claimants into early versions of events, and potentially result in claim withdrawals before significant legal expenses are incurred.
Australia Litigation
GC
Gilchrist Connell
Article
Adverse Credit And Weight Of Evidence In Personal Injury Matters
A recent Personal Injury Commission decision examines how adverse credibility findings can fundamentally undermine a workers compensation claim, even when supported by medical evidence. The case explores the interplay between witness reliability, corroborative evidence, and the 'fair climate doctrine' when medical opinions rest heavily on self-reported histories from discredited sources.
Australia Litigation
BP
Bartier Perry
Article
Case Summary – Randwick City Council V Wunderwald [2026] NSWCA 116
The New South Wales Court of Appeal examined whether a $50,000 award for future economic loss to a minor injured in a café accident met the evidentiary requirements of the Civil Liability Act 2002. The decision clarifies the stringent standards courts must apply when assessing damages for children, particularly regarding assumptions about future earning capacity and the need for concrete evidence rather than mere possibilities.
Australia Litigation
CO
Carroll & O'Dea
Article
Steps To Take When You Have Been Injured In A Public Or Private Space
When an accident occurs on public or private property in New South Wales, understanding your legal rights and taking immediate action can be crucial to any future compensation claim. This guide outlines the essential steps to protect your interests, from documenting the incident scene to preserving critical evidence that may determine whether you can successfully prove negligence and recover damages.
Australia Litigation
CO
Carroll & O'Dea
Article
Much-needed Judicial Guidance In Forced Adoption Cases From Lamont
In the forced adoption case of Lamont, the Supreme Court confirmed that the plaintiff’s consent to the adoption of her child in 1968 was valid and informed, rejecting claims that she was coerced into doing so. The Court further found that the defendants adhered to the societal and legal standards of the time, and were not in breach of their duty of care in the course of the adoption.
Australia Litigation
BN
Barry Nilsson
Article
Assessing New Injury Claims In Existing NSW Workers’ Compensation Matters: The Importance Of Identifying Inconsistencies And The Role Of Contemporaneous Evidence
When workers claim newly identified injuries under pre-existing workers' compensation claims, insurers face complex evidentiary challenges. The Ma'ilei v Unisson Disability case demonstrates how medical evidence and contemporaneous documentation determine the outcome of claims for cervical spine, lumbar spine, and psychological injuries stemming from a single workplace incident.
Australia Employment
BP
Bartier Perry
Article
From Chemicals To Courtrooms: Tracking The Expanding Landscape Of PFAS Litigation
PFAS contamination litigation is evolving through distinct waves, from environmental property damage claims to consumer-manufacturer disputes and emerging personal injury actions. As scientific evidence mounts and regulatory scrutiny intensifies, Australian courts face a potential flood of claims mirroring the billions in settlements already paid in the United States, with manufacturers, governments, and corporations throughout the supply chain confronting unprecedented legal exposure.
Australia Environment
PA
Piper Alderman
See more