ARTICLE
27 November 2012

Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (November 2012) – Video Companion

LL
Lerners LLP

Contributor

Lerners LLP is one of Southwestern Ontario’s largest law firms with offices in London, Toronto, Waterloo Region, and Strathroy. Ours is a history of over 90 years of successful client service and representation. Today we are more than 140 exceptionally skilled lawyers with abundant experience in litigation and dispute resolution(including class actions, appeals, and arbitration/mediation,) corporate/commercial law, health law, insurance law, real estate, employment law, personal injury and family law.
Lerners LLP appellate lawyer, Brian Radnoff, provides a summary of Lerners Top 5 Ontario civil appeals decisions from October 2012.
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Lerners LLP appellate lawyer, Brian Radnoff, provides a summary of Lerners Top 5 Ontario civil appeals decisions from October 2012.

1) Georgian Bluffs v. Moyer- This case involves the issue of when a municipality is liable for the trespass when it attempts to clear trash from a right of way, the appropriate measure of damages for the trespass and who should pay the cost of proceeding.

2) McCarthy Tétrault v. Guberman-- This case answers the question of a client can assess or challenge their lawyers account when the client agreed to pay the lawyer's account and the statutory provisions for assessing a lawyer's account do not apply.

3) SA Capital Growth v. Mander- An important appeal for receivership proceedings. It deals with who is considered an interested party in a receivership and when parties in receivership proceedings are entitled to obtain documents, particularly when they want them for other proceedings.

4) Sazant v. College of Physicians and Surgeons- An important case for administrative bodies, particularly dealing with professional regulation. The Court of Appeal determined whether s. 8 of the Charter (unreasonable search and seizure) applies to investigations by the College of Physicians and Surgeons and summons powers their investigators have. The Court of Appeal determined that the summons power is constitutional.

5) Duchesne v. St. Denis- This is a complicated decision dealing with a limitation act issue: when a limitation period starts to run for a minor. The Court deals with the issue of whether two parties could be added to personal injury litigation and the Court of Appeal made comments about when a minor discovers a claim for the purpose of limitation period.

Originally published 23 November 2012

www.lerners.ca

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More