ARTICLE
14 October 2013

Seizure To Secure Evidence Also Possible In Non-IP Matters

DB
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V.

Contributor

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek is a leading international law firm, trusted by clients for over 150 years due to its deep engagement with their businesses and a clear understanding of their ambitions. While rooted in Dutch society, the firm offers global coverage through its network of top-tier law firms, ensuring seamless, tailored legal solutions. De Brauw’s independence enables it to choose the best partners while remaining a trusted, strategic advisor to clients worldwide.

The firm emphasizes long-term investment in both its client relationships and its people. De Brauw’s legal training institutes, De Brauwerij and The Brewery, cultivate diverse talent, preparing the next generation of top-tier lawyers through rigorous training and personal development. Senior leadership traditionally rises from within, maintaining the firm’s high standards and collaborative culture.

The Netherlands Supreme Court recently held that the pre-judgment seizure of documents, files or other materials as evidence is permissible in non-IP matters.
Netherlands Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Netherlands Supreme Court recently held that the pre-judgment seizure of documents, files or other materials as evidence is permissible in non-IP matters. While the seizure of evidence in IP matters was possible upon the 2004 implementation of the Enforcement Directive, what remained unclear was whether such seizures also applied to non-IP matters.

The Court also reiterated that this right does not warrant a fishing expedition, nor does it grant the seizor the right to access or receive copies of seized materials; it is simply a security measure. Separate proceedings are necessary to actually obtain access to seized materials.

The Court issued relatively detailed instructions on the execution of such seizures, as well as on corresponding provisions and safeguards.

Please contact us for more details on what this broadening in possibilities to produce evidence could mean for your practice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More