ARTICLE
8 July 2025

Preinstitution Mediation Is Mandatory, Even For Counterclaims, Under The Commecial Courts Act 2015: Aditya Birla Fashion & Retail Ltd v Mrs Saroj Tandon

TC
Tuli & Co

Contributor

Tuli & Co is an insurance-driven commercial litigation and regulatory practice established in 2000. With offices in New Delhi and Mumbai, we undertake work for a cross section of the Indian and international insurance and reinsurance market and work closely alongside Kennedys’ network of international offices
The Delhi High Court has held that pre-institution mediation under §12A of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 is mandatory for counterclaims, just as it is for an original suit.
India Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Delhi High Court has held that pre-institution mediation under §12A of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 is mandatory for counterclaims, just as it is for an original suit. The Court said that for the purpose of pre-institution mediation, counterclaims and original suits have no distinction.

Background

The dispute arose on account of Aditya Birla seeking a refund of its security deposit for terminating a lease agreement during the Covid-19 pandemic from the defendant. Aditya Birla instituted a pre-institution mediation, but the mediation process failed because of the non-appearance of the defendant. Aditya Birla filed a commercial suit. A counterclaim was filed by the defendant for unpaid dues, but without the initiation of the pre-institution mediation under §12A.

An application under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 was filed by Aditya Birla for the rejection of the counterclaim because of non-compliance with the mandatory pre-institution mediation process. The Trial Court dismissed the application holding that the mandatory pre-institution process only applies to an original suit.

Decision

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and held the following:

  1. A counterclaim must adhere to all the procedural requirements applicable to a commercial suit, as a counterclaim is not separate from a suit.
  2. The process of mandatory pre-institution mediation as per §12A of the Commercial Courts Act applies to counterclaims which are not seeking urgent interim relief.
  3. Participation in pre-institution mediation for the original suit does not negate the need for pre-institution mediation for the counterclaim.
  4. As a counterclaim may involve a different subject matter and reversed party roles, it requires independent compliance with §12A.

Conclusion

The Court clarified that pre-institution mediation under §12A of the Commercial Courts Act is a mandatory procedural requirement for both suits and counterclaims.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More