South Africa: Trademark

South African law enforcement authorities conducted a major operation in Johannesburg's CBD, seizing over 1,700 counterfeit sports items worth more than R1.5 million just days before a high-profile Springboks versus New Zealand rugby match. The multi-agency raid uncovered not only fake merchandise bearing well-known sports brands but also manufacturing equipment, suggesting the premises served as both a production facility and distribution center for counterfeit goods.

A Taiwan Intellectual Property Office decision demonstrates how trade mark protection applies to stylised single-letter devices when an earlier mark has gained substantial recognition through extensive use. The case examines Netflix's opposition to a similar stylised 'M' mark and explores the balance between protecting established brand identity and allowing traders to develop their own marks.

Major tech companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google have registered their chatbot names as trademarks, and businesses across retail and financial sectors are following suit. Should your customer-facing chatbot receive the same legal protection before competitors claim similar names in your industry?

Instagram's viral colour-swatch trend has brands proving their visual identity without logos or names—but does consumer recognition translate into legal protection? This analysis explores whether colour alone can function as a trade mark under South African law, examining the high evidential threshold required and lessons from landmark disputes involving Cadbury's purple and Louboutin's red sole.

7-Eleven has initiated legal action against Nike over a new Air Max 95 sneaker design, claiming the shoe's distinctive orange, green and red colour scheme infringes on the retailer's well-known trade mark branding.

A critical analysis of the South African High Court's decision in Soft Coffee v Nonnas Pasta reveals a judgment that correctly applied the notional use doctrine and dismissed an improperly pleaded prior use defence, yet failed to distinguish between different forms of trade mark infringement. The court's conflation of sections 34(1)(a) and (b) resulted in an overbroad interdict that extends beyond what the legal reasoning can support, particularly regarding the respondent's company name versus product brand

This comprehensive legal update covers recent developments across South African law, from pharmaceutical naming regulations and copyright platform liability to VAT amendments affecting insurance and digital services. The collection explores emerging challenges in intellectual property protection, cryptocurrency regulation, and data brokering, while examining how AI and digital transformation are reshaping traditional legal frameworks.

What started as a single video has turned into a nationwide trend — and potentially something far more valuable: a commercial asset.

Het jy al ooit gewonder wie betaal vir wie wanneer persoonlike regte, handelsmerke en kopiereg in ʼn film so vervleg raak dat geen mens meer weet wat aangaan nie.