United Kingdom: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Commercial litigation demands careful preservation of electronic evidence from the moment a dispute emerges. Documents disclosed during proceedings can fundamentally alter case outcomes, yet businesses often underestimate how early preservation obligations arise and how widely relevant material may be scattered across devices, platforms, and archived systems.

Recent UK case law demonstrates how experimental evidence can decisively influence patent disputes on infringement and validity, but only when parties navigate strict procedural requirements, proportionate disclosure obligations, and careful alignment with patent specifications. Courts increasingly scrutinize the design, statistical rigor, and relevance of experiments while maintaining pragmatic standards for admissibility versus persuasiveness.

Facing harassment allegations requires careful handling to avoid worsening your legal position. Understanding what constitutes harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, preserving crucial evidence, and knowing when to seek professional legal representation can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

The recent arrest of 17 individuals as part of a large-scale organised crime investigation is notable not simply because of the scale of the police operation, but because it highlights the range of financial and regulatory consequences that can follow when suspected organised crime intersects with legitimate businesses and the financial system.

Trower J's judgment in Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Prax Lindsey Oil Refinery Ltd provides crucial guidance on when courts will grant leave to commence proceedings against a company in liquidation under section 130(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986. The case examines the balance between protecting a company's limited assets during liquidation and allowing creditors with proprietary claims to pursue their rights outside the statutory proof process.

A recent High Court ruling demonstrates that successful parties in litigation should not face unnecessary delays in recovering their legal costs. The case of Ocorian Private Trustees v McGeoch examines how courts determine reasonable interim payments when final cost assessments are still pending, and what evidence carries the most weight in such decisions.

Martha's Rule is a national NHS patient safety initiative that provides patients, families, carers and medical staff with a formal route to request urgent clinical reviews when concerns about deteriorating conditions are not being adequately addressed. This comprehensive guide examines how the Rule operates across England's acute hospital settings, its implementation timeline, and its potential relevance to medical negligence claims.

Trower J's judgment in Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Prax Lindsey Oil Refinery Ltd provides crucial guidance on when courts will grant leave to commence proceedings against a company in liquidation under section 130(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986. The case examines the balance between protecting a company's limited assets during liquidation and allowing creditors with proprietary claims to pursue their rights outside the statutory proof process.

A recent High Court ruling demonstrates that successful parties in litigation should not face unnecessary delays in recovering their legal costs. The case of Ocorian Private Trustees v McGeoch examines how courts determine reasonable interim payments when final cost assessments are still pending, and what evidence carries the most weight in such decisions.

Eversheds Sutherland provides comprehensive legal services through a global network of separate and distinct legal entities. The firm's website offers access to legal professionals, insights on international arbitration, workplace technology deployment, and sovereign immunity cases, while maintaining clear disclaimers about the general information nature of its materials.

The UK Supreme Court's narrow 3-2 decision in The Kingdom of Bahrain v Shehabi denies state immunity to foreign governments accused of remotely hacking individuals within UK territory, establishing that cyber surveillance operations causing harm to UK residents fall outside traditional immunity protections. This landmark ruling clarifies the territorial tort exception under the State Immunity Act 1978 and may expose foreign states to liability for state-sponsored cyberattacks targeting UK-based individuals

The UK Supreme Court has ruled on whether sovereign states can invoke immunity to resist enforcement of adverse ICSID arbitration awards in English courts. Spain and Zimbabwe challenged the registration...