ARTICLE
23 March 2026

Mortgage Pre-Approval Letter Misrepresentations May Trigger Chapter 93A Claims

GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 3,100 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.

In Bokhari v. North Eastern Savings Bank, the Massachusetts Superior Court allowed a Chapter 93A claim to proceed to trial against a lender based...
United States Massachusetts Finance and Banking
Greenberg Traurig, LLP are most popular:
  • within Transport topic(s)

In Bokhari v. North Eastern Savings Bank, the Massachusetts Superior Court allowed a Chapter 93A claim to proceed to trial against a lender based on alleged misrepresentations contained in a mortgage pre-approval letter issued to prospective homebuyers. The plaintiffs — the sellers — claimed the pre-approval letter the defendant issued to the buyers did not actually verify the buyers' credit, assets, or income. The plaintiffs allegedly relied on the pre-approval letter to enter into a purchase and sale agreement with the buyers, only to suffer losses when the buyers later walked away from the transaction. The defendant moved for summary judgment arguing, among other things, that the Chapter 93A claim should fail because the plaintiffs lacked a direct commercial relationship with the defendant.

The court rejected that argument, emphasizing that Chapter 93A liability does not always require a direct commercial relationship between the parties. Instead, the court noted that the relevant inquiry is whether the alleged conduct interfered with and occurred "in the conduct of any trade or commerce." Accordingly, knowingly or recklessly conveying false information in a business context in order to help a client bring about a commercial transaction with a third party constitutes conduct "in trade or commerce" and may violate Chapter 93A. The court concluded that the summary judgment record could support a trial finding that the defendant acted in a business context and interfered with trade or commerce by intentionally or negligently misrepresenting the basis for its pre-approval letter, which foreseeably induced the plaintiffs to enter into the purchase and sale agreement. Therefore, the absence of a direct commercial relationship did not preclude the Chapter 93A claim.

Bokhari reinforces the concept that Chapter 93A liability may attach, even absent a direct business relationship, where misrepresentations made in a commercial context foreseeably influence a third party's participation in a commercial transaction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More