ARTICLE
27 April 2017

Brands Beware!!!! FTC Scrutinizing Influencer Posts For Compliance With Endorsement Guides

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
In response to a petition from a coalition of consumer groups last year complaining about the need for disclosures by social media influencers...
United States Consumer Protection
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

In response to a petition from a coalition of consumer groups last year complaining about the need for disclosures by social media influencers, the FTC recently announced on April 19, 2017 that it had issued more than ninety letters reminding influencers and brands that "if there is a 'material connection' between an endorser and the marketer of a product – in other words, a connection that might affect the weight or credibility that consumers give the endorsement – that connection should be clearly and conspicuously disclosed, unless the connection is already clear from the context of the communication containing the endorsement." The FTC explained that material connections could "consist of a business or family relationship, monetary payment, or the provision of free products from the endorser." A copy of the form of the letter, which explains that clear and conspicuous disclosures are required can be found here.

The FTC raised specific posts with influencers and marketers that were featured in influencer posts. The FTC letter made clear that when disclosures are made they need to be made so that consumers can see them readily at the top of a post so that consumers will not skip over or miss them, meaning that a disclosure placed at the end of a string or below a "more" button is not likely to be conspicuous.

The FTC noted in its press release that "particular disclosures that are not sufficiently clear, pointing out that "many consumers will not understand a disclosure like '#sp,' 'Thanks [brand],' or '#partner'" to mean that a post is sponsored. The FTC letters included copies of the Endorsement Guides (here) and the publication "FTC's Endorsement Guides: What People are Asking" (here), both of which are useful for background information. The names of the influencers and brands were not publicly released.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More