ARTICLE
11 February 2026

States Oppose OCC Escrow Interest Preemption Proposals

CO
Cozen O'Connor

Contributor

Founded in 1970, Cozen O’Connor has more than 925 attorneys practicing internationally in 32 cities across North America and Europe. We are a full-service firm with award-winning practices in litigation, business law, and government relations, and our attorneys have experience operating in all sectors of the economy. Our diverse client list includes global Fortune 500 companies, middle-market firms poised for growth, ambitious startups, and high-profile individuals.

A bipartisan coalition of 23 AGs and several state banking regulators submitted a comment letter urging the OCC to withdraw two proposals...
United States Finance and Banking
Cozen O'Connor’s articles from Cozen O'Connor are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Property industries
Cozen O'Connor are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property and Family and Matrimonial topic(s)
  • A bipartisan coalition of 23 AGs and several state banking regulators submitted a comment letter urging the OCC to withdraw two proposals addressing mortgage escrow accounts—an escrow rule and a related preemption determination that would preempt certain state laws requiring national banks to pay minimum interest on mortgage escrow accounts.
  • In the letter, the states argue that state laws requiring lenders to pay interest on mortgage escrow accounts are long-standing consumer protection measures and that Congress has not authorized national banks to operate escrow accounts free from generally applicable state minimum-interest requirements.
  • The coalition also contends the OCC's proposals conflict with Dodd-Frank's limits on bank preemption, including the "significant interference" test, and that the OCC has not satisfied the procedural and evidentiary requirements for a preemption determination.
  • The states urge the OCC to abandon both proposals, arguing they are contrary to established law and would improperly deprive states of their authority to protect consumers in their interactions with national banks.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More