ARTICLE
5 August 2025

Federal Judge Saddles CVS Caremark With $95 Million Judgment

HB
Hall Benefits Law

Contributor

Strategically designed, legally compliant benefit plans are the cornerstone of long-term business stability and growth. As such, HBL provides comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in M&A, ESOPs, executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, retirement plans, and ERISA litigation matters. Responsive, relationship-driven counsel is the calling card of the Firm.
A federal judge in Pennsylvania recently issued a ruling finding that CVS Caremark Corp., a pharmacy benefits manager (PBM), owed the federal government $95 million...
United States Pennsylvania Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

A federal judge in Pennsylvania recently issued a ruling finding that CVS Caremark Corp., a pharmacy benefits manager (PBM), owed the federal government $95 million for overbilling Medicare Part D-sponsored drugs. The Court did not rule on the government's request for treble damages, leaving that issue for a later date after the parties have briefed it.

When Caremark handled Medicare Part D sponsored plans for Aetna Life Insurance Co., it allegedly overbilled for prescription drugs by charging the federal government more than what it paid pharmacies for the drugs. The overbilling led to Sarah Behnke filing a False Claims Act case against Caremark. Behnke, a former Aetna actuary turned whistleblower, alleged that Caremark's overbilling resulted in $240 to $330 million in damages, based on findings from 2012 and 2013. Caremark maintained that the higher drug prices resulted from market conditions.

The judge found that Caremark's actions artificially inflated the price of prescription drugs covered under Medicare Part D, which, in turn, led the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to overpay for the drugs. In his ruling, the judge awarded damages based on the relationships Caremark had with pharmacies Rite Aid and Walgreens, not with CVS Pharmacy, which is a separate entity. The federal government did not directly participate in the case. However, it filed a statement of interest citing its strong interest in ensuring that the Medicare Part D programs do not overpay for prescription drugs.

The case is United States ex rel. Sarah Behnke v. CVS Caremark Corp. et al., No. 2:14-cv-00824 (E.D. Pa.).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More