United States: Disclosure & Electronic Discovery & Privilege

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
When Investigations Collide: Managing Congressional And Enforcement Risk
When a congressional inquiry surfaces facts that attract DOJ attention, or an enforcement action triggers legislative scrutiny, companies face a complex challenge: managing investigations across multiple forums where document productions, witness statements, and strategic decisions in one proceeding can reshape risk in another. Understanding how these investigations intersect—and preparing before the second letter arrives—has become essential as the 2026 midterm elections promise to shift oversi
United States Government
HK
Holland & Knight
Article
Court Evaluates AI-Related Provisions In Discovery Protective Orders
As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into litigation workflows, courts are grappling with how these tools should be used with confidential discovery materials. A recent Colorado district court decision examines the balance between enabling AI-assisted legal work and protecting sensitive information, distinguishing between consumer-grade platforms and enterprise tools with robust safeguards.
United States Litigation
GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Article
Rule 702 Gatekeeping In Arizona Eminent Domain – Recent Developments
Recent amendments to Arizona Rule 702 and federal court decisions have fundamentally shifted how courts evaluate expert appraisal testimony in eminent domain cases. Courts now apply more rigorous gatekeeping standards, requiring proponents to demonstrate by a preponderance of evidence that expert opinions rest on sufficient data and reliable methodology before reaching the jury.
United States Litigation
N
Nossaman LLP
Article
Congressional Letter Puts Spotlight On Unenforceable Secrecy Demands In Federal Subpoenas
Federal lawmakers have formally challenged the widespread practice of law enforcement agencies using boilerplate nondisclosure language in subpoenas to silence companies from notifying their customers. Senator Ron Wyden and Representative Pramila Jayapal argue that these demands may lack legal authority and violate First Amendment rights, calling for audits and reforms to clarify recipients' rights and curb what they describe as decades of agency overreach.
United States Government
CM
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article
AI In Expert Witness Testimony: What Litigators Need To Know About LLM Discovery Risks
Generative AI tools have quietly entered the expert witness process, and recent litigation developments show how exposed that process can become. Experts who use AI tools like ChatGPT or other LLMs to help draft reports may be creating a detailed, time-stamped record of their reasoning that opposing counsel can obtain and use to undermine the expert at deposition or trial.
United States Litigation
B
Bracewell
Article
If We Ignore It, Will It Go Away? – A Cautionary Tale Of Timeliness
Under Washington State law, failing to act in a timely manner at any stage of a lawsuit, from pre-suit initiation through active litigation to post-judgment proceedings, can carry severe procedural and substantive consequences. These consequences range from the absolute bar of a claim or defense to monetary sanctions, evidentiary exclusions, dismissal of the action, and the loss of the right to appeal or collect on a judgment.
United States Litigation
BB
Beresford Booth
Article
Oregon State Court Civil Discovery: No Interrogatories, No Routine Expert Reports. Litigate Accordingly.
Oregon's civil discovery rules diverge sharply from federal practice by eliminating interrogatories and generally prohibiting compelled pretrial disclosure of retained expert testimony. Understanding these procedural differences and adapting discovery strategy accordingly can mean the difference between building a winning record and discovering critical gaps too late to address them.
United States Litigation
HS
Harris Sliwoski
Article
Texas Business Court Prohibits Foreign Attorneys From Accessing Protected Documents
The Texas Business Court recently clarified who qualifies as an attorney when dealing with confidential and attorney's eyes only designations in discovery. In a case involving alleged trade secret misappropriation between rival transformer manufacturers, the court examined whether attorneys from India representing the plaintiff in other matters could access protected documents in the Texas state court case...
United States Litigation
JW
Jones Walker
Article
Check Your Parachute: SDNY Finds Waiver After Inadvertent Production Of Privileged Documents
A federal court ruling examines what happens when a party inadvertently produces over 5,400 privileged documents to government investigators and attempts to claw them back. The decision hinges on whether reasonable steps were taken to prevent disclosure in the first place, with the court finding that flawed document review processes and inadequate quality control led to privilege waiver despite the inadvertent nature of the production.
United States Litigation
S
Steptoe LLP
Article
The New Litigation Metadata: Experts’ AI Prompts May Not Stay Behind The Scenes
When an expert uses generative AI to analyze documents in litigation, do the prompts used become discoverable as part of the expert's methodology? A federal magistrate judge recently addressed this question, finding that AI prompts used to cull a document production may be subject to discovery under Rule 26(b), creating new tensions between efficiency and transparency in expert analysis.
United States Litigation
GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
See more