ARTICLE
3 November 2022

U.S. Customs Re-Clarifies Foreign Vessel Scope For Offshore Wind Cable Installation

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection in a September 2, 2022 ruling narrowed the scope of what a foreign cable lay vessel can lawfully do on U.S. offshore wind projects.
United States Transport
Charlie Papavizas’s articles from Winston Taylor are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Insurance industries

U.S. Customs and Border Protection in a September 2, 2022 ruling narrowed the scope of what a foreign cable lay vessel can lawfully do on U.S. offshore wind projects. CBP partially altered its views on October 28 with regard to the transportation of cable remaining after a cable lay operation is complete.

CBP has long held that a foreign vessel may pick up pipe or cable in a U.S. port and lay it from that point to another point in the United States or otherwise between two U.S. "points." What constitutes a U.S. "point" offshore is the subject of several CBP rulings. The rationale is that the laying of pipe or cable is not the "transportation" of "merchandise" between two U.S. points which is proscribed by U.S. coastwise law known as the "Jones Act."

With respect to excess cable, CBP determined in 1982 that a cable lay vessel could return to a U.S. port a de minimis amount of excess cable it had loaded at a different U.S. port. On September 2, CBP indicated that its 2019 guidance on what constitutes "vessel equipment"-which is an exception from the Jones Act-eliminated the de minimis excess cable determination. CBP reasoned that the 2019 guidance, which did away with prior de minimis reasoning in the context of vessel equipment, also did away with the excess cable ruling reasoning which was not based on the vessel equipment exception.

On October 28, CBP noted that the 1982 determination was preserved in the 2019 guidance and so revived the excess or de minimis cable rule. CBP indicated that "the outcome" of the 1982 determination "with regard to the surplus cable remains intact, in that, after the cable-laying operation has been performed, a small amount of surplus cable aboard a non-coastwise qualified vessel maybe landed at a U.S. port." CBP defined "small amount" as "five percent by quantity or less of the total amount laid."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More