- within Intellectual Property topic(s)
- within Tax, Law Practice Management and Law Department Performance topic(s)
From Lab to Patient, Garage to Market with Philip Crowley, Episode 29
In this episode of the From Lab to Patient, Garage to Market, Phil Crowley speaks with Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner at Nath, Goldberg and Meyer, also known as "The Green Patent Guy".
- Watch the episode on YouTube.
- Stay tuned to Listen to the episode on Spotify.
- Stay tuned to Listen to the episode on Apple.
- Stay tuned to Listen to the episode on iHeart Radio.
- Read the whole transcript.
Read the summary and watch or listen to the interview here:
Voiceover:
Welcome to the From Lab to Patient, Garage to Market podcast with
your host, Phil Crowley. In each episode, we discuss professionals
serving the tech startup market and the issues that matter most to
those companies.
You can find this show on all major platforms, including YouTube,
LinkedIn, Facebook, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and on our website,
crowleylawllc.com.
Now, here's the host of From Lab to Patient, Garage to Market,
Phil Crowley.
Phil Crowley:
Hello and welcome. Thank you for tuning into our podcast. We bring
you leaders in the life sciences and technology sectors who share
their perspectives +on developments in this space, how to succeed,
mistakes to avoid, and techniques to help accelerate your success.
Our goal is to help you develop products and services that enrich
the lives of thousands—or even millions—of people.
Phil Crowley:
Today, I'm delighted to have as my guest Joshua Goldberg,
co-managing partner of Nath, Goldberg & Meyer in Alexandria,
Virginia, and a very experienced intellectual property law
colleague. Stay tuned, because at the end of our discussion
I'll ask Josh to share a couple of practical tips you can use
to help accelerate your growth.
Josh, welcome.
Joshua Goldberg:
Thank you, Phil. Happy to be here.
Phil Crowley:
Please tell us a bit about your background and the path that led
you to your current line of work.
Joshua Goldberg:
Like many IP attorneys, I have a science background. I earned a
degree in chemical engineering and, before law school, worked in
industry for a couple of years doing drug composition
work—tablets, capsules, pellets, coatings, and similar
formulations.
I learned a tremendous amount, including the realization that I
wasn't meant to be a bench chemist. While thinking about what
else I could do with my background, I remembered a professor who
once talked about his patent lawyer friend with a ranch in
Colorado, a collection of sports cars, and a helicopter. I thought,
"That doesn't sound so bad."
So I went to law school to become a patent attorney. I don't
have the ranch, my fancy car is a Civic Hybrid, and I'd be too
scared to fly a helicopter—but it still worked out pretty
well.
Phil Crowley:
That's a great example of career development.
What types of work are you doing today to help companies succeed,
and what intellectual property issues are coming to the
forefront?
Joshua Goldberg:
It's a wide variety. Most often, someone comes to me with a
great idea and says, "I want a patent on this so I can launch
a product and own the market." I usually have to slow them
down and recommend starting with a search to determine whether the
idea is actually patentable.
Just yesterday, I spoke with a solo inventor who was very excited
about his idea. After doing a search, I had to tell him that the
chances of obtaining a patent were very low. He wasn't happy to
hear that, but he was grateful to know before spending years and
thousands of dollars. I was also able to advise him on other ways
to protect himself if he chose to move forward.
There are options even when a patent isn't
available—though I'll save some of that for later
tips.
Phil Crowley:
Very interesting.
What are the hot areas in patent law today? We hear a lot about
artificial intelligence and major advances in biotechnology.
Joshua Goldberg:
You named two of the biggest ones. Biotechnology remains incredibly
active, and AI is everywhere—how to use it to improve
processes, how to invent with it, and how to invent around
it.
The issue I often see is that people say, "My invention uses
AI," without having substance behind it. For example, someone
once told me they added AI to a toaster oven. When I asked what the
AI actually did, how it worked, or what algorithm or model it used,
they didn't know. At that point, it's an idea—not an
invention.
Simply adding AI doesn't make something patentable. You need to
think it through, develop it, and build it.
With my chemistry background, I also do a lot of work in
agriculture and battery storage technology, particularly for energy
generated from solar panels and wind turbines. These are very hot
areas right now.
Phil Crowley:
What misconceptions do people commonly have about patent law?
Joshua Goldberg:
The biggest misconception is that a patent gives you the right to
do something. In reality, a patent gives you the right to stop
others from doing something. It's a negative right.
People often believe that having a patent guarantees they can make
and sell a product worldwide, but that's not how patents work.
A patent allows you to exclude others from practicing the patented
invention within the jurisdiction where it's granted.
Phil Crowley:
Exactly. You can have a patent and still be unable to market your
innovation. A simple example is bicycle wheels and
spokes—each may be patented separately, preventing either
party from operating without permission.
Joshua Goldberg:
That's a perfect example and often leads to cross-licensing.
You let me practice under your patent, I let you practice under
mine, and everyone benefits.
Phil Crowley:
You've emphasized that companies should focus not just on one
patent, but on building a portfolio. Why is that important?
Joshua Goldberg:
There are two main reasons. First, if you're a non-practicing
entity—like an individual inventor or a
university—it's much easier to license or sell a bundle
of patents than a single one.
Second, if you're manufacturing and selling products, a single
patent often leaves room for competitors to design around it. A
portfolio helps surround the competitive space and makes it harder
for others to compete.
This is common in the pharmaceutical industry and sometimes
criticized as anti-competitive, but often it reflects real
innovation and incremental improvements that require significant
R&D.
Phil Crowley:
What about trade secrets?
Joshua Goldberg:
Trade secrets are often underappreciated. The downside is that they
must be kept secret and can be lost if reverse engineered. The
upside is that, unlike patents, trade secrets can last
indefinitely.
A classic example is the Coca-Cola formula—one of the most
valuable trade secrets in history. That said, with advances in AI,
some speculate that even secrets like that may someday be
deciphered.
Phil Crowley:
Where do trademarks fit into an IP strategy?
Joshua Goldberg:
Trademarks protect your brand—your name, logo, and
identity—not the invention itself. You can obtain federal
trademark registration for nationwide protection, but you can also
acquire common law trademark rights through use in individual
states.
Common law rights are harder to find, which can sometimes work to
your advantage, but they're geographically limited. Federal
registration offers broader, clearer protection.
Phil Crowley:
What about copyrights, especially in software development?
Joshua Goldberg:
This is critical. If someone writes code for you without a written
agreement—such as a work-for-hire contract—you may not
own the rights. That person could reuse or sell the code elsewhere,
even if it's central to your business.
Written agreements are essential. Handshake deals are simply too
risky today.
Phil Crowley:
How do inventors protect themselves internationally?
Joshua Goldberg:
Filing a U.S. patent application starts a one-year clock to file
internationally. To extend that window, inventors can file under
the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), which effectively reserves
their rights for up to 30 or 31 months.
This gives inventors more time to evaluate markets, funding, and
commercial viability before committing to expensive international
filings.
Phil Crowley:
Can you give a rough idea of patent costs?
Joshua Goldberg:
Without knowing the technology, I typically tell clients to expect
$8,000 to $15,000 to go from initial consultation through filing a
U.S. patent application. That includes searches, drafting claims
and specifications, drawings, and government fees.
If someone quotes $500 for a patent application, it's almost
certainly not a full utility patent—the government fees alone
would consume most of that.
Phil Crowley:
What are your top tips for innovators?
Joshua Goldberg:
First, if you can't get a patent, focus on building a strong
brand. Develop your product or service, protect your trademarks,
get to market quickly, and become the recognized leader in your
space.
Second, have a plan. Investors care about risk. A clear strategy
for IP protection, product development, and growth makes you far
more investable.
Phil Crowley:
Joshua, thank you for sharing your insights. This has been a great
discussion.
To our listeners, remember that this is a video podcast available
on all major platforms. Please check out our book, Avoid Startup
Failure, on Amazon, and visit our website at crowleylawllc.com for
free resources and past episodes.
Thank you for listening.
Voiceover:
Thank you for tuning into the From Lab to Patient, Garage to Market
podcast with your host, Phil Crowley. Please subscribe, leave a
review, and share with others if you found this episode
helpful.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
[View Source]