ARTICLE
27 May 2025

Pre-1972 Conveyance Of Multiple Lots Did Not Create Separate Legal Parcels Under Map Act

PC
Perkins Coie LLP

Contributor

Perkins Coie is a premier international law firm with over a century of experience, dedicated to addressing the legal and business challenges of tomorrow. Renowned for its deep industry knowledge and client-centric approach, the firm has consistently partnered with trailblazing organizations, from aviation pioneers to artificial intelligence innovators. With 21 offices across the United States, Asia, and Europe, and a global network of partner firms, Perkins Coie provides seamless support to clients wherever they operate.

The firm's vision is to be the trusted advisor to the world’s most innovative companies, delivering strategic, high-value solutions critical to their success. Guided by a one-firm culture, Perkins Coie emphasizes excellence, collaboration, inclusion, innovation, and creativity. The firm is committed to building diverse teams, promoting equal access to justice, and upholding the rule of law, reflecting its core values and enduring dedication to clients, communities, and colleagues.

A landowner sought a Certificate of Compliance from the City of Oakland, asserting that a pre-1972 deed referencing three lots (Lot 18, Lot 17, and a portion of Lot 16) created three separate legal parcels.
United States Real Estate and Construction

Under the Subdivision Map Act, the creation of legal parcels prior to 1972 requires more than a deed referencing multiple lots—only a conveyance that separates a portion of land from contiguous property creates a new legal parcel. Cox v. City of Oakland, 17 Cal.5th 362 (2025).

A landowner sought a Certificate of Compliance from the City of Oakland, asserting that a pre-1972 deed referencing three lots (Lot 18, Lot 17, and a portion of Lot 16) created three separate legal parcels. The City denied the request, arguing that the deed conveyed a single parcel encompassing all three lots, as they were never separately conveyed. The trial court sided with the City, but the Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the deed did create separate parcels. The Supreme Court granted review to resolve the issue.

The Subdivision Map Act requires landowners to obtain local government approval and record a map before dividing property into smaller parcels for sale, lease, or financing. The Supreme Court focused on the meaning of "division of land" under section 66412.6(a) of the Map Act and harmonized it with the Map Act's general definition of "subdivision" in section 66424.

The Court first emphasized that conveyance alone is not enough. Simply referencing multiple lots in a deed does not constitute a legal division of land into separate parcels. For a division to occur, there must be a conveyance that places a portion of land into separate ownership, distinct from contiguous lands. In addition, the Court noted that prior to 1972, a lot depicted on an antiquated map did not gain independent legal status unless it was actually conveyed separately from surrounding lands. The recordation of a map or the use of lot numbers in a deed served primarily as a descriptive tool, not as a legal division.

In this case, Lot 18 was always conveyed together with at least one other contiguous lot and was never separately conveyed. Therefore, it was never "created" as a distinct parcel under the Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More