ARTICLE
18 March 2026

VR Images, AR Images, Projections, And Holograms Are Now Patentable Designs At The USPTO

BK
Brooks Kushman

Contributor

Since the firms founding in 1983, Brooks Kushman has built a national reputation as a premier intellectual property law firm. We have accomplished this by attracting the best talent, and by working closely with clients to understand how your business really operates and what really drives your company or brand.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer‑Generated Interfaces and Icons...
United States Intellectual Property
Brooks Kushman are most popular:
  • within Privacy topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Technology industries
  • Under the Expanded Guidance on Design Patents for Computer‑Generated Interfaces and Icons

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer‑Generated Interfaces and Icons1 in the Federal Register2 that are effective March 13, 2026. The guidance significantly expands flexibility for design patent applicants seeking protection for graphical user interfaces (GUIs), icons, and emerging digital designs, including projected, holographic, virtual‑reality (VR), and augmented‑reality (AR) interfaces.

The guidance updates the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) relating to the "article of manufacture" requirement under 35 U.S.C. § 171.

Key Takeaways

  • Display screens no longer need to be shown in drawings for many GUI and icon designs.
  • "For a computer / computer system / display" claim language is now expressly endorsed.
  • Projected, VR, AR, and holographic interfaces are recognized as potentially design‑patent eligible.
  • The USPTO adopts a broader, technology‑neutral interpretation of "article of manufacture."

These updates provide greater drafting flexibility for practitioners and expand protection opportunities. However, careful claim drafting remains critical and the application must still clearly identify an article of manufacture. Applicants with pending design applications, as well as those considering new filings, may wish to reassess claim strategy in light of this guidance.

Although these updates go into effect at the USPTO immediately, these updates are procedural and do not reflect a change in the law. A cautious practitioner may consider filing embodiments with and without the display screen for compliance with the updated procedures and the existing caselaw.

Footnotes

1. https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2026-04987/guidance-examination-of-design-patent-applications-related-to-computer-generated-interfaces-and?utm_campaign=subscriptioncenter&utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=

2. https://federalregister.gov/d/2026-04987

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More