ARTICLE
10 March 2026

Class Action Decisions Published January 2026

SH
Shook, Hardy & Bacon

Contributor

Shook, Hardy & Bacon has long been recognized as one of the premier litigation firms in the country. For more than a century, the firm has defended companies in their most substantial national and international products liability, mass tort and complex litigation matters.

The firm has leveraged its complex product liability litigation expertise to expand into several other practice areas and advance its mission of “being the best in the world at providing creative and practical solutions at unsurpassed value.” As a result, the firm has built nationally recognized practices in areas such as intellectual property, environmental and toxic tort, employment litigation, commercial litigation, government enforcement and compliance, and public policy.

Standing in Class Action Cases. The Ninth Circuit held that pursuant to TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), following class certification...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Shook, Hardy & Bacon are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking, International Law and Consumer Protection topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Metals & Mining industries

Highlights from this issue include: 

  • Standing in Class Action Cases. The Ninth Circuit held that pursuant to TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), following class certification, both named and unnamed class members in a money damages suit must present evidence of standing at summary judgment.
  • Representation of Class and Individuals in Separate Lawsuits. The First Circuit provided guidance on whether counsel may concurrently represent individual plaintiffs and a class against the same defendants. It noted leading treatises were split on the question and it found no on-point case law in any circuit. The First Circuit made clear that it was not deciding whether the court should have appointed this lawyer as class counsel in the first instance—it only decided that class counsel's simultaneous representation of three individual claimants with similar claims against the same defendants did not preclude the district court from approving a class-action settlement.
  • Attorneys' Fees. The Tenth Circuit held that either a percentage-of-the-fund or a lodestar analysis could satisfy Oklahoma's class action attorneys' fees statute, so long as the ultimate award is reasonable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More