- with Finance and Tax Executives and Inhouse Counsel
- with readers working within the Healthcare, Property and Telecomms industries
Third-party AI tools can dramatically improve efficiency—but they also introduce legal risks that many businesses overlook. From data ownership and confidentiality to IP rights and liability, traditional software contracts often fall short when applied to AI. This article outlines the critical contract provisions organizations should address to protect their business when engaging third-party AI vendors.
Third-party AI tools are now widely used across industries for
drafting, analytics, customer service, and automation. While these
tools offer clear efficiency gains, they also introduce legal risks
that traditional software contracts were not designed to
address.
Organizations using AI must focus not only on functionality, but on
contractual protectionsthat manage data, intellectual property,
regulatory compliance, and liability. This article outlines the key
AI contract provisions to consider when engaging third-party AI
vendors.
Why AI Contracts Require Special Attention
AI software contracts require special attention because AI tools differ from conventional software in several important ways. They often:
- Process large volumes of sensitive or proprietary data
- Operate through complex and often opaque models
- May reuse customer data to train or improve systems
- Generate outputs that can raise AI intellectual property rights and regulatory concerns
Without tailored AI vendor agreements, organizations may face significant exposure with limited contractual remedies.
1. Data Ownership and Usage Rights
A core issue in AI vendor contracts is AI data ownership. Contracts should clearly state that the customer retains ownership of all input data and, where possible, AI-generated outputs. Any vendor rights to use customer data—particularly for model training or analytics—should be explicitly limited.
Key AI contract clauses for data protection should address:
- Whether data may be used beyond providing the AI service
- Whether data is anonymized before secondary use
- How long the vendor may retain the data
Undefined data rights are one of the most common and avoidable AI contract risks.
2. Confidentiality and Data Security
Strong AI confidentiality obligations are essential when using third-party AI tools. Vendors should be contractually required to protect all customer data and implement appropriate technical and organizational safeguards.
AI data protection clauses should specify:
- Breach notification timelines
- Incident response cooperation
- Ongoing security standards
For law firms and other regulated industries, these protections are critical to AI compliance requirements and professional responsibility obligations.
3. Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Contracts should require AI vendors to represent and warrant that their services comply with applicable laws, including data protection statutes and industry-specific AI compliance regulations.
Important legal considerations when using third-party AI include:
- Allocation of compliance responsibility
- Cross-border data processing and transfers
- Commitments to update the AI service as laws evolve
Customers should avoid accepting full regulatory risk where they lack operational control or transparency into the AI system.
4. Intellectual Property Rights
AI-generated content presents unique challenges for intellectual property ownership. AI software contracts should clearly address:
- Ownership or licensing of AI outputs
- Permitted commercial use
- Protection against third-party IP infringement
Indemnification for AI IP infringement claims is particularly important when AI outputs are customer-facing or revenue-generating.
5. Accuracy, Performance, and Oversight
Although AI vendors typically disclaim accuracy guarantees, AI contract provisions should still define:
- Service availability and performance standards
- Known limitations of the AI tool
- The role of human review or oversight
Clear expectations help reduce the risk of misuse and support AI risk management for businesses.
6. Indemnification and Liability
Well-drafted AI vendor agreements should include indemnities covering:
- Data breaches caused by the AI vendor
- IP infringement by the AI system
- Legal violations attributable to the service
AI liability and indemnification clauses should be reviewed carefully to ensure that limitation-of-liability provisions do not undermine meaningful protection.
7. Transparency, Audits, and Accountability
Given the complexity of AI systems, contracts may include AI governance and accountability provisions, such as:
- Security or compliance audits
- Access to certifications or third-party assessments
- Documentation explaining system functionality and risks
Even limited transparency can significantly improve AI contract risk management.
8. Termination and Data Exit Rights
Effective AI software contracts should clearly address termination and data exit rights. Upon termination, vendors should be required to:
- Return customer data in a usable format
- Delete retained data and certify deletion
- Provide reasonable transition assistance if needed
An effective exit strategy is a key element of managing legal risk of AI vendors.
Conclusion
Third-party AI tools can deliver substantial value, but only
when paired with thoughtful contractual protections for AI tools.
Clear terms governing data use, AI intellectual property rights,
compliance, security, and liability are essential to managing the
evolving legal risks AI presents.
As AI regulation and technology continue to evolve, organizations
should regularly review AI vendor agreements and seek legal
guidance where appropriate. In this area, careful contracting is
not optional—it is a core component of responsible AI
use.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
[View Source]