The Creation Of Canada’s Financial Crimes Agency: A New Era In Financial Crime Enforcement

Proposed reform shows financial crime is more than just a law enforcement issue

Overview

The Government of Canada introduced Bill C-29, An Act to establish the Financial Crimes Agency and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts and regulations (Bill), on April 27, 2026. This Bill will establish the Financial Crimes Agency (Agency), a much-anticipated dedicated and specialized federal law enforcement body. The Agency’s proposed mandate will be to investigate serious and complex financial crimes and to contribute to the recovery of proceeds of crime.

This proposed reform reflects a growing recognition that financial crime is no longer solely a law enforcement issue, but a matter of economic security and geopolitical importance.

While this long-awaited reform represents a significant step forward, it also raises important questions about how it will translate into operational impact.

Key Features

The Bill defines “financial crime” very broadly, encompassing any offence relating to financial assets, including digital assets, or financial services or markets. This definition could extend to sanctions violations, cryptocurrency-related offences, insider trading, serious fraud and other emerging forms of financial crime. This breadth provides the Agency with important flexibility to address evolving threats.

The Agency would conduct investigations, while prosecutorial authority would rest with the Attorney General of Canada. This model preserves the existing institutional roles within the Canadian system, but it differs from certain international approaches that integrate investigative and prosecutorial functions within a single agency, such as the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office. While the separation reflects the traditional Canadian approach, it may also require strong coordination mechanisms to ensure efficiency in complex, multi-jurisdictional cases.

The Bill also grants the Attorney General of Canada the power to issue and serve a fiat – the power to assert prosecutorial authority over financial crimes committed in a province – if the alleged financial crime has been investigated by the Agency. While this mechanism may significantly enhance the ability to address matters of national importance and interprovincial issues in a coordinated and centralized manner, it could also raise questions regarding the balance between enforcement efficiency and Canada’s federal structure, including the provinces’ specific jurisdictions.

The Bill also includes provisions for the recovery of proceeds of crime and for international cooperation in combating financial crime. These elements signal a clear policy direction, even if further legislative or regulatory guidance will likely be required to deploy them effectively as the Bill provides limited detail on how either will function in practice.

The establishment of the Agency represents a significant institutional advancement and reflects a growing recognition that financial crime is increasingly a matter of national and economic security requiring a coherent, national response. In this context, the Agency marks a shift toward a more centralized and strategic approach to financial crime enforcement in Canada.

However, the question remains whether these new measures can address long-standing shortcomings in financial crime enforcement. Historically, Canada has not secured a high volume of prosecutions in serious or complex financial crimes matters and all eyes will be on the Agency as it seeks to generate tangible enforcement outcomes.

Takeaways

For organizations operating in Canada, the Bill signals a potentially more coordinated and proactive financial crime enforcement environment. This heightened enforcement environment underscores the growing importance of robust compliance frameworks, particularly in the areas of anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions, anti-corruption and anti-fraud.

Organizations should consider

• reviewing and strengthening their existing AML, sanctions and anti-corruption compliance programs and measures;
• assessing internal controls and reporting mechanisms for detecting financial misconduct;
• assessing readiness to respond to potential investigations by a centralized federal authority, including internal investigation protocols; and
• evaluating exposure to cross-border investigations and information sharing.

As the Bill progresses through Parliament, further clarity may emerge regarding the Agency’s operational framework. In the meantime, the proposed reforms already signal a clear focus toward a more assertive and coordinated approach to financial crime enforcement in Canada.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.