ARTICLE
24 July 2025

LD Munich, July 16, 2025, Order Concerning An Application For Compensation

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Parties may withdraw actions and counterclaims before a final decision if there's no legitimate interest in continuing according to R. 265.1 RoP, as is the case with settlements.
Germany Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Withdrawal of Actions

Parties may withdraw actions and counterclaims before a final decision if there's no legitimate interest in continuing according to R. 265.1 RoP, as is the case with settlements.
In this case, both the claimant and the defendant withdrew their respective action and counterclaim after reaching a settlement.

Withdrawal of Compensation Applications

Applications for compensation under R. 213.2 RoP are treated like actions and can be withdrawn under the same conditions as other actions according to R. 265 RoP.
Similar to the main action and the counterclaim, the defendants also withdrew their application for compensation after the settlement.

Partial Reimbursement of Fees

The court can deviate from the standard fee reimbursement scale in exceptional cases, such as when the proceedings have been particularly intensive according to R. 370.9 (e) RoP.
Due to the high number of applications filed and the resulting workload for the court, only 40% of the fees were reimbursed for the infringement action and counterclaim.

Fees for Compensation Applications

Applications for compensation under Rule 213.2 RoP are subject to court fees, payable by the applicant.
The court rejected the defendants' argument that no fees are due for such applications, clarifying that the UPC operates on a fee-based system.
Notably, the term "damages" in Rule 132 RoP, concerning fees, includes compensation sought under Rule 213.2 RoP. This clarifies that the existing fee structure applies to compensation applications.

2. Division

LD Munich, Panel 1

3. UPC number

UPC CFI 2/2023; UPC CFI 298/2023

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement action, counterclaim for revocation, application for compensation

5. Parties

Claimants: 10x Genomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College

Defendants: Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc., Luxendo GmbH, Bruker Nederland B.V.

6. Patent

EP 4 108 782

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 265 RoP, Rule 213.2 RoP, Rule 370 RoP, Rule 125 RoP, Rule 126 RoP, Rule 132 RoP

self

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More