ARTICLE
4 March 2026

Nearshoring In Mexico: Corporate Challenges And Corporate Structuring For Foreign Investment.

O
OLIVARES

Contributor

Our mission is to provide innovative solutions and highly specialized legal advice for clients facing the most complicated legal and business challenges in Mexico. OLIVARES is continuously at the forefront of new practice areas concerning copyright, litigation, regulatory, anti-counterfeiting, plant varieties, domain names, digital rights, and internet-related matters, and the firm has been responsible for precedent-setting decisions in patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Our firm is committed to developing the strongest group of legal professionals to manage the level of complexity and interdisciplinary orientation that clients require. During the first decade of the 21st century, the team successfully led efforts to reshape IP laws and change regulatory authorizations procedures in Mexico, not only through thought leadership and lobbying efforts, but the firm has also won several landmark and precedent-setting cases at the Mexican Federal and Supreme Courts levels, including in constitutional matters.
Nearshoring has changed the dynamics of global production chains by moving processes to regions that are geographically closer to target markets for geopolitical, logistical, and strategic reasons.
Mexico Corporate/Commercial Law
Gustavo Alcocer’s articles from OLIVARES are most popular:
  • within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
  • in United States
OLIVARES are most popular:
  • within Corporate/Commercial Law, Antitrust/Competition Law, Government and Public Sector topic(s)

Nearshoring has changed the dynamics of global production chains by moving processes to regions that are geographically closer to target markets for geopolitical, logistical, and strategic reasons. In this scenario, Mexico is positioned as one of the main destinations for foreign investment in North America due to its integration into the USMCA, its proximity to the United States, and its manufacturing infrastructure. However, attracting foreign investment also requires good legal and corporate structure to reduce regulatory, corporate and operational risks. Although the Foreign Investment Law establishes as a general rule the possibility of foreign participation in any proportion in Mexican companies (except in specific cases reserved by law), the regulatory openness does not remove the need for a prior strategic analysis.

In nearshoring operations, the corporate structure must take into account factors such as the number of investors, the issuance of shares, transfer restrictions, international tax planning and the possible integration into holding structures. In this context, the drafting of the bylaws is important, because if there is deficient corporate governance, it generates uncertainty and future conflicts.

Critical factors for corporate and operational structuring:

  • Certain strategic sectors have greater regulatory exposure.
  • Investment linked to nearshoring  has a regional concentration, especially in the north and center of the country, which causes pressure on infrastructure (mobility, water and power), increases real estate costs and increases competition for specialized talent. These factors have an impact on strategic decisions such as the determination of the registered office, the acquisition or long-term lease of real estate and the design of operational structures.
  • Legal risk derived from deficiencies in regulatory compliance and corporate governance in Mexican companies. Foreign companies tend to operate under international standards of control and integrity, so the lack of adequate internal compliance mechanisms can generate administrative sanctions, criminal liability and reputational damage. In multi-partner structures, the absence of formal and clear corporate governance leads to corporate disputes and paralysis in strategic decisions.

Nearshoring is  a relevant opportunity for Mexico, but true success will depend not only on foreign capital, but also on its being complemented by the institutional and corporate capacity to structure it with legal certainty. A poorly structured investment may have corporate conflicts, regulatory and contractual contingencies and, on the contrary, with a well-designed structure, it strengthens operational stability and investor confidence.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More