ARTICLE
26 May 2026

HSR Update: Fifth Circuit Grants Abeyance In Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) Appeal

SP
Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Contributor

Squire Patton Boggs is a full service global law firm providing insight at the point where law, business and government meet, giving you a voice, supporting your ambitions and achieving successful outcomes.

With a multidisciplinary team of over 1,500 lawyers in over 40 offices across four continents, we are well-established geographically with strong local and regional positions in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and Latin America, and our practice experience spans all key sectors.

The Federal Trade Commission has moved to pause its appeal of a district court decision that vacated sweeping changes to Hart-Scott-Rodino Act reporting requirements, signaling potential new rulemaking on the horizon.
United States Antitrust/Competition Law
Squire Patton Boggs LLP are most popular:
  • within Finance and Banking, Government, Public Sector and Energy and Natural Resources topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Banking & Credit industries

May 26, 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) unopposed motion to hold its appeal in abeyance in Chamber of Commerce v. FTC.

The appeal arises from the district court’s decision vacating the FTC’s 2024 rule, overhauling and greatly expanding the reporting requirements under the HSR Act. In seeking abeyance, the FTC explained that it is “seriously considering potential revisions” to the HSR notification requirements, and that the current aim is to publish any notice of proposed rulemaking further revising the HSR reporting requirements by the end of 2026. During the abeyance, the FTC will continue to accept HSR filings using the same form and instructions that were in place before the FTC’s 2024 rule took effect in February 2025.

What this means

The grant of abeyance, and the FTC’s stated rationale, suggests:

  • There will be no near-term appellate resolution of the district court’s vacatur of the FTC’s 2024 HSR rule

  • Any changes to the HSR form are more likely to come through revised rulemaking

  • The current (pre-2025) HSR regime is likely to remain in place through at least the remainder of 2026

  • Parties should use the prior HSR form as the default for current filings. The reduced upfront burden (including more limited narrative and document requirements) should continue to apply for the foreseeable future.

  • Expect continued agency engagement during the waiting period. Even under the prior form, agencies may seek additional information informally, particularly in transactions involving clear overlaps or vertical relationships.

  • Consider targeted supplemental disclosures where appropriate. In higher-risk deals, providing focused additional detail upfront may still help shape agency understanding and avoid delays.

  • Plan with greater timing certainty, but remain flexible longer-term. Parties should continue to monitor potential revised rulemaking that could affect transactions extending into 2027.

  • Remain mindful of document creation going forward. Materials prepared today (including strategic plans, competition analyses and transaction-related documents) could ultimately fall within the scope of a revised HSR regime if new requirements take effect in 2027 and should be drafted with that possibility in mind.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More