ARTICLE
17 October 2025

Four States Settle With Mortgage Company For Alleged Unlicensed Activity

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On September 26, 2025, financial regulators in Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and Texas entered into a multistate Settlement Agreement and Consent Order with a mortgage company to resolve allegations of unlicensed activity...
United States Hawaii Idaho Oregon Texas Corporate/Commercial Law
This article from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP is most popular:
  • in United States
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On September 26, 2025, financial regulators in Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and Texas entered into a multistate Settlement Agreement and Consent Order with a mortgage company to resolve allegations of unlicensed activity, inadequate supervision, and examination noncompliance under each state's mortgage licensing laws. The agreement followed a coordinated multistate examination conducted in October 2023.

The participating regulators alleged that the company violated multiple provisions of their respective state's mortgage lending and loan originator licensing acts between 2021 and 2023. The states cited unlicensed origination and processing activity, failure to cooperate during examinations, and insufficient oversight of remote work arrangements as constituting improper or dishonest conduct. The company neither admitted nor denied the allegations and entered into the settlement to resolve the matter without further proceedings.

Under the consent order, the company agreed to pay $669,000 in administrative penalties, of which $501,750 is due upon execution and $167,250 will remain in abeyance for one year, accruing interest at one percent per month. The abeyance portion becomes immediately payable if the company fails to comply with the agreement or resumes unlicensed activity.

Putting It Into Practice:  The settlement marks another enforcement action targeting unlicensed lending activities (previously discussed here). Mortgage lenders and brokers must ensure that all originators and processors are properly licensed or registered in each state where they operate. Failing to do so invites enforcement, administrative penalties, and reputational risk.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More