ARTICLE
27 March 2020

Employers Must Avoid Actions That Interfere With Employee Rights To Union Representation

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
Union and employer corruption scandals have dominated the headlines in recent months. Many union and company officials have been convicted...
United States Employment and HR
Philip B. Phillips’s articles from Foley & Lardner are most popular:
  • with Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Securities & Investment and Law Firm industries

Union and employer corruption scandals have dominated the headlines in recent months.  Many union and company officials have been convicted and given lengthy prison sentences for bribery, embezzlement and other forms of corruption. For example, several automotive companies and the United Auto Workers (UAW) union have been targets of federal criminal investigations and prosecutions involving allegations of corruption.  Some things are (or should be) obviously illegal, e.g., paying a bribe to a union official to side with the company on an issue.  These schemes are often designed to benefit the employer to the detriment of the unionized workforce.  Employers, however, should be aware that many not-so-obvious actions involving unions could be considered unlawful.

Under Section 8(2)(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), it is unlawful, i.e., an unfair labor practice, for an employer “to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other support to it.” This provision of the NLRA covers conduct that has a tendency to undermine or interfere with the interests of union employees and their right to be represented by a union of their choosing.  Although cases of this nature are often highly fact-specific and assessed based on the totality of the circumstances, some examples of conduct generally considered unlawful include:

  • An employer recognizing a union as the exclusive representative of employees before the union has obtained majority support from employees
  • A supervisor participating in union organizing efforts, such as soliciting employees to sign union authorization cards
  • Threatening or coercing an employee to sign an authorization card
  • An employer establishing and controlling a company union
  • Remitting employee dues to a union without a valid, signed dues checkoff authorization
  • Contributing money to a union, e.g., paying for a conference room where union organizing activity is taking place
  • Wining and dining union officials

Employer actions, even if well-intentioned and designed to foster a positive labor-management relationship, could be considered unlawful.  Employers must maintain an arms-length relationship with the union and avoid conduct that interferes with employees’ right to representation of their choice, or that could be construed as attempting to control or dominate the union.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More