ARTICLE
4 August 2025

Appeals Court Puts Reinstatement Of Two Democratic Members Of NCUA Board On Hold

BS
Ballard Spahr LLP

Contributor

Ballard Spahr LLP—an Am Law 100 law firm with more than 750 lawyers in 18 U.S. offices—serves clients across industries in litigation, transactions, and regulatory compliance. A strategic legal partner to clients, Ballard goes beyond to deliver actionable, forward-thinking counsel and advocacy powered by deep industry experience and an understanding of each client’s specific business goals. Our culture is defined by an entrepreneurial spirit, collaborative environment, and top-down focus on service, efficiency, and results.
The reinstatement of two Democratic NCUA board members has been put on hold by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
United States Finance and Banking

The reinstatement of two Democratic NCUA board members has been put on hold by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

In a short order, a three-judge panel of the court ruled that the reinstatement of Todd Harper and Tanya Otsuka should be paused, at least temporarily.

"ORDERED that the district court's summary judgment order, dated July 22, 2025, be administratively stayed pending further order of this court," the appeals court said. "The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion."

Judge Amir H. Ali, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia had determined that the Democrat NCUA board members Todd Harper and Tanya Otsuka could only be removed for cause. Trump had fired them without cause and, thus, Judge Ali had ruled that Trump had fired them illegally.

The Trump Administration appealed that ruling. Because no stay of Judge Ali's order had yet been granted, Harper and Otsuka participated in a July 24 NCUA board meeting.

Harper and Otsuka must now file a response to the Administration's motion for an emergency stay by August 4. The Administration must file any reply by August 11.

Given the developments in other related cases that we have blogged about, Harper and Otsuka face the proverbial uphill battle.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More