ARTICLE
2 June 2026

Family Home Issues In Divorce: Insights From Anita M. Ventrelli And Michele M. Jochner

SD
Schiller DuCanto & Fleck LLP

Contributor

The Chicago law firm of Schiller DuCanto & Fleck LLP is one of the largest divorce and family law firms of its kind in the country. It is internationally recognized as a model for firms practicing family law and has a primary focus on helping affluent clients solve problems to achieve the best possible results. The firm’s mission of ensuring quality, knowledge and experience to their clients is evident through our wide range of services tailored to our clients’ unique needs.
Two family law attorneys examine the intersection of emotional attachment and financial reality when dividing marital real estate, addressing common misconceptions about ownership versus liability and the critical role of timing in property rights. The article provides strategic guidance on navigating complex issues from mortgage obligations to state-specific legal frameworks that govern how homes are treated during divorce proceedings.
United States Family and Matrimonial
Schiller DuCanto & Fleck LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy industries

Schiller DuCanto & Fleck attorneys Anita M. Ventrelli and Michele M. Jochner recently co-authored an article for the American Bar Association’s Spring 2026 issue of the Family Advocate magazine examining the legal and practical challenges surrounding real property division during divorce. The article explores how emotional attachment to a family home often intersects with complex financial and legal realities.

Below are several key takeaways from their publication:

1. The Family Home Is Both Emotional and Financial

For many clients, the marital home represents stability, memories, and identity. However, during divorce proceedings, attorneys must help clients evaluate the home as a financial asset, including affordability, long-term maintenance costs, taxes, and the impact on other marital assets.

2. Ownership and Mortgage Liability Are Not the Same

A common misconception in divorce matters is that title ownership automatically determines financial responsibility. As the authors explain, signing a quitclaim deed may remove ownership rights, but it does not necessarily remove mortgage liability. Refinancing and lender approval remain critical considerations.

3. Timing Can Significantly Affect Property Rights

Whether a home was acquired before marriage, refinanced during marriage, or maintained with marital funds can impact how courts classify and divide the property. The article highlights how pre-marital contributions, inherited funds, and refinancing decisions may all influence equitable distribution outcomes.

4. Divorce Agreements Should Anticipate Future Issues

Pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements can help clarify ownership expectations and reduce future disputes involving real estate. The authors also emphasize the importance of carefully drafted settlement language addressing refinancing deadlines, indemnification obligations, and potential sale contingencies.

5. State Laws Matter

The treatment of real property in divorce varies significantly between community property and equitable distribution states. Understanding the governing legal framework is essential when evaluating ownership interests, equity claims, and division strategies.

The full article, “Home is Where the Heart Is? Legal and Practical Strategies for Navigating Real Property in Divorce,” was published in the American Bar Association’s Family Law Section’s Spring 2026 Family Advocate magazine and is available through the ABA publication platform for members.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More