ARTICLE
18 March 2025

CFPB Moves Forward With Military Lending Act Enforcement Against Installment Lender

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On March 10, 2025, the CFPB informed the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas that it will proceed with litigation against a short-term installment lender and its subsidiary for alleged violations of the Military Lending Act.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On March 10, 2025, the CFPB informed the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas that it will proceed with litigation against a short-term installment lender and its subsidiary for alleged violations of the Military Lending Act (MLA).The lawsuit alleges that the lender violated the MLA and a 2013 administrative consent order by issuing loans to military service members with interest rates exceeding the MLA's 36% cap, included mandatory arbitration provisions in loan contracts, and failed to provide required disclosures. The CFPB further asserts that these practices continued despite a prior CFPB enforcement order against the lender's predecessor.

Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that the lender:

  • Charged interest rates exceeding the MLA's 36% cap. Between June 2017 and May 2021, the lender allegedly issued over 3,600 pawn loans to more than 1,000 military borrowers with APRs frequently exceeding 200%.
  • Included mandatory arbitration clauses in loan agreements. The Bureau asserts that loan contracts required military borrowers to submit to arbitration in the event of a dispute, despite the MLA's explicit prohibition on such provisions.
  • Failed to provide necessary MLA disclosures. The lender allegedly did not furnish covered borrowers with necessary loan disclosures, including the Military Annual Percentage Rate (MAPR), before or at the time of transaction.
  • Violated a prior CFPB enforcement order. The lender was subject to a 2013 CFPB consent order barring it and its successors from further MLA violations.The Bureau contends that the lender ignored and continued to engage in prohibited lending practices.

Putting It Into Practice: The CFPB's decision marks the second MLA enforcement action it decided to move forward with this month (previously discussed here).This signals that MLA enforcement remains a priority under the new administration.Lenders offering credit to military service members should expect continued scrutiny and ensure compliance with MLA requirements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More