ARTICLE
24 July 2025

CFPB Orders Pawn Lender To Pay $9 Million For Alleged Military Lending Act Violations

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On July 11, 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced a proposed $9 million settlement resolving its November 2021 lawsuit against...
United States Finance and Banking
A.J. Dhaliwal’s articles from Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • in Asia
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On July 11, 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced a proposed $9 million settlement resolving its November 2021 lawsuit against a national pawn lender and its subsidiaries. The company and its subsidiaries operated more than 1,000 retail pawnshops across the United States and offer short-term, collateralized loans through a network of wholly owned subsidiaries.

The CFPB alleges the companies violated the Military Lending Act (MLA) by:

  • Issuing loans exceeding the MLA interest cap. The Bureau alleges the companies made pawn loans to active-duty servicemembers and dependents with annual percentage rates above the MLA's 36% limit.
  • Implementing prohibited arbitration terms. Loan agreements allegedly included mandatory arbitration provisions, in violation of the MLA's prohibition against such terms.
  • Failing to provide required disclosures. The companies purportedly did not deliver key MLA-required written disclosures at the time of the loan transaction.
  • Violating the Bureau's prior order. The Bureau further alleges the conduct breached a 2013 consent order issued against a related entity.

If approved by the court, the settlement would require the companies to pay $5 million in consumer redress and a $4 million civil money penalty to the CFPB's victims relief fund. The companies would also be mandated to offer a loan product to servicemembers and their dependents that is MLA-compliant or implement a screen for MLA-protected borrowers before issuing loans.

Putting It Into Practice: This settlement highlights the CFPB's continued enforcement of the Military Lending Act and its focus on lenders that provide high-cost credit to servicemembers (previously discussed here and here and here). Pawn lenders and other small-dollar creditors should ensure their loan products meet all MLA requirements, including interest rate limits, disclosure obligations, and restrictions on arbitration clauses.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More