ARTICLE
8 June 2026

California DFPI Announces $1M Settlement With Yotta For ‘FDIC Insurance’ Misrepresentations

GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 3,100 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.

California's Department of Financial Protection and Innovation secured a $1 million settlement with fintech company Yotta Technologies for allegedly misleading thousands of consumers about FDIC insurance protection on their savings accounts.
United States Consumer Protection

On May 15, 2026, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced a $1 million settlement with Yotta Technologies, Inc. for alleged deceptive practices under the California Consumer Financial Protection Law (CCFPL).

Yotta, a fintech company that offered savings products with prize-linked incentives for consumers to open accounts with them, moved consumers’ accounts from FDIC insured Evolve Bank & Trust to Synapse Brokerage LLC (Synapse Brokerage), a subsidiary of Synapse Financial Technologies (Synapse). Six months after receiving the Yotta accounts, Synapse filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2024, leaving thousands of California consumers unable to access funds. In August 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a complaint against Synapse and, in its September 2025 stipulated final order, established a Civil Penalty Fund for consumer redress.

In its consent order, the DFPI alleges that Yotta misled consumers by representing accounts as “FDIC insured” and marketing that consumers’ money “is always 100% safe and secure,” even after transferring funds to a brokerage structure that did not provide such protection.

“Yotta blatantly deceived thousands of California customers regarding the risk to their accounts,” DFPI Commissioner KC Mohseni said in the department’s press release. “It enticed customers to use its financial products and services under false pretenses, ultimately resulting in millions of dollars in lost funds. California will not tolerate these kinds of fraudulent practices and will hold those who flout our laws accountable.”

Consent Order

Under the DFPI’s consent order, Yotta must:

  • Pay a $1 million civil penalty over 24 months. Failure to make the agreed-upon payments would result in the DPFI imposing the full penalty amount of $48 million on Yotta.
  • Cease deceptive representations, including claims that cash deposits are protected “against all risks.”
  • Provide notice to affected California customers with positive balances in their Yotta accounts as of May 17, 2024, with information about their accounts and how to obtain relief from the CFPB’s $46 million Civil Penalty Fund for consumers harmed by the Synapse bankruptcy.
  • Designate a consumer contact for at least 120 days to address inquiries.

Takeaways

The Yotta consent order underscores growing regulatory focus on fintech-bank partnerships, “banking-as-a-service” (BaaS) models, and false representations about deposit insurance coverage, particularly where funds move through intermediaries. Additionally, California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s recent appointment of Rohit Chopra, former director of the CFPB, may position California to lead state regulatory enforcement efforts, with the goal of “modernizing California’s consumer protection framework amid growing threats from weakened federal enforcement.”

Fintech companies should consider verifying that their marketing representations are substantiated by reliable facts, especially as to deposit insurance coverage to consumers. Fintech companies and partner banks should also consider implementing controls around partner risk, such as due diligence and escalation processes, and mapping the full custody chain of customer funds to identify points where insurance coverage may not apply.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More