- in European Union
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
If the Federal Trade Commission's proposal to ban most companies from using/enforcing non-competition agreements is finalized, this could have a significant effect relative to the tax treatment of golden parachute payments pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 280G and 4999. In change of control situation for public companies, a non-competition agreement is sometimes used as a tax-mitigating alternative. Any portion of a parachute payment that is supportably attributed to the fair market value of a non-competition agreement can be treated as reasonable compensation and hence excluded from the parachute payment for the purpose of measuring whether or not the parachute payment exceeds the safe harbor limit. Therefore, removing non-competition agreements from the golden parachute equation could bring about changes in how these arrangements are structured.
Rule to Ban Noncompetes Clauses: The Commission will vote on whether to issue a proposed final rule that would prevent most employers from enforcing noncompetes against workers. The proposed final rule being considered would generally prevent most employers from using noncompete clauses.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
[View Source]