ARTICLE
14 August 2024

Allegedly Deceptive Credit Repair Scheme Settles With FTC For $12 Million

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On August 5, the FTC announced a proposed settlement which included a $12 million fine in connection with a complaint it filed against operators of a credit repair operation in May of 2022.
United States Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

Listen to this post

On August 5, the FTC announced a proposed settlement which included a $12 million fine in connection with a complaint it filed against operators of a credit repair operation in May of 2022. The initial complaint alleged that the company violated the Credit Repair Organizations Act, the FTC Act's prohibition against unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices, and the Telemarketing Sales Rule, by preying on consumers with low credit scores by deceptively promising credit building services they could not deliver on, and taking illegal advance fees.

The FTC charged that the company lured in consumers with promises of cleaning up their credit by removing all negative items from their credit reports, and then recruited them into a pyramid scheme of selling the credit repair services to others. The company overstated the potential to make money through participation in the pyramid scheme, claiming that consumers could make tens of thousands of dollars recruiting others into the company. Additionally, the complaint stated that the company and its owners and operators deceived consumers about their credit building product and also charged an advance fee for their services, in violation of the Credit Repair Organizations Act.

Settlement of this case will lead to more than $12 million in assets being turned over to the FTC. The Commission voted 5-0 to approve the order. The FTC filed the proposed orders in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

Putting It Into Practice: Federal regulators have repeatedly brought enforcement actions against companies utilizing deceptive practices, particularly in the credit repair space (previously discussed here and here). This development underscores regulators' commitment to stamping out deceptive credit repair tactics as well as illegal pyramid schemes. We anticipate the FTC will continue to bring enforcement actions against companies engaging in deceptive practices in connection with the offering of credit repair services, as well those who require advance fees for services.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More