ARTICLE
11 February 2026

AG Campbell Cancels Crypto Kiosk Crooks

CO
Cozen O'Connor

Contributor

Founded in 1970, Cozen O’Connor has more than 925 attorneys practicing internationally in 32 cities across North America and Europe. We are a full-service firm with award-winning practices in litigation, business law, and government relations, and our attorneys have experience operating in all sectors of the economy. Our diverse client list includes global Fortune 500 companies, middle-market firms poised for growth, ambitious startups, and high-profile individuals.

Massachusetts AG Andrea Joy Campbell filed a lawsuit against Bitcoin Depot Operating LLC and its parent, Bitcoin Depot, Inc. (collectively, "Bitcoin Depot"), alleging...
United States Massachusetts Technology
Cozen O'Connor’s articles from Cozen O'Connor are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Property industries
Cozen O'Connor are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property and Family and Matrimonial topic(s)

Source: The State AG Report

State: Massachusetts

Industry: Banking, Finance, Crypto; Securities

Area of Law: Consumer Finance, Mortgages & Debt, Consumer Protection

  • Massachusetts AG Andrea Joy Campbell filed a lawsuit against Bitcoin Depot Operating LLC and its parent, Bitcoin Depot, Inc. (collectively, "Bitcoin Depot"), alleging the company violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law and related regulations by using deceptive pricing practices at its cryptocurrency kiosks and by failing to take meaningful steps to prevent scam transactions.
  • According to the complaint, Bitcoin Depot allegedly misled customers about the total price of their purchase by displaying lower Bitcoin prices at the beginning of a transaction and then adding hidden fees so that the final Bitcoin price paid was higher than the original price advertised.
  • The complaint further alleges Bitcoin Depot knew a substantial portion of large-dollar kiosk transactions were tied to scams, yet reduced fraud safeguards and failed to provide a meaningful refund process for victims.
  • Separately, the AG's office alleges the parent company misled Massachusetts investors by framing fraud as a future "risk" in filings, while allegedly failing to disclose that fraud/scam transactions were already occurring at a material level and were a major revenue driver for the company.
  • The AG's office seeks injunctive relief, restitution and other consumer refunds, civil penalties, and costs and fees.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More