China: Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

Mainland Chinese courts do not enforce U.S. judgments, making litigation against Chinese companies complex. Understanding jurisdiction requirements, service of process protocols under the Hague Convention, discovery limitations, and the strategic advantages of arbitration versus court proceedings in China is essential for foreign companies seeking to recover damages or enforce contractual obligations against Chinese entities.

特許の進歩性審査における「技術常識」の認定基準と立証要件について、最高人民法院の判例を通じて、教科書や技術辞典以外の専門文献が技

2026年8月末から9月にかけて、中国最高人民法院知的財産権法廷が公表した複数の裁判要旨は、特許の進歩性判断、クレーム解釈、営業秘密保護、&#

When a standby letter of credit explicitly stipulates that it is issued under UCP600, how should Chinese courts identify its legal nature and apply the law? This article examines divergent judicial approaches...

최근, 중국 최고인민법원 지식재산법정은 특허권 침해분쟁 사건의 심리 중 특허권이 무효로 선고되어원고의 소가 먼저 각하된 경우, 침해소송에서 발생한 감정비는 일반적으로 원고가 부담한다는 재판요지를 공개한다.

상하이시 고급인민법원이 소이 로봇과 애플 간의 특허 침해 분쟁에서 애플의 손을 들어주며 Siri가 특허권을 침해하지 않았다고 판결했다. 이 사건은 AI 분야 5

中国の最高人民法院知的財産権法廷が公表した3つの重要な特許判例を分析。特許製品のラベル貼り替え転売行為の法的性質、特許無効時の訴訟

A Chinese court ruled that Molly Tea's floral logo infringed Louis Vuitton's registered trade marks, awarding $1.5 million in damages despite public backlash. The case sparked debate about Western luxury brands claiming exclusive rights over geometric floral motifs that resemble traditional Chinese decorative patterns. This landmark decision offers critical insights into how Chinese courts assess trade mark similarity, consumer perception, and cross-industry brand protection.

上海市高级人民法院在小i机器人与苹果公司的专利侵权纠纷中作出一审判决，驳回小i机器人的全部侵权诉讼请求。本案围绕聊天机器人系统专利௚