On 29 June 2010, the Paris Court of Appeal (the "Court") annulled a cartel fine imposed on a railway maintenance firm, Offroy, because the French Competition Authority (the "Authority") lacked sufficient evidence to prove that the company had taken part in a cartel.
Moreover, the fines imposed on two other companies, Vecchietti and ETF, were reduced. The Court ruled that the Authority had wrongly increased the fines for recidivism, noting that the Authority had mistakenly taken into account a cartel infringement that occurred after the exchange of information concerned.
However, the additional appeals of two other companies, Colas Rail and Pichenot Bouille, were rejected. In addition, all claims concerning the authorisations of the dawn raids, which may have allowed the Authority to prove the existence of a cartel, were also dismissed.
On 29 July 2009, the Authority had fined the five railway maintenance firms a total of €4.2 million for exchanging information before submitting bids in response to a tender procedure.
As a consequence of the Court's ruling, Offroy has been relieved of its €500,000 fine and allegations of its involvement in the cartel have been retracted since the evidence collected by the Authority was insufficient to prove its involvement. Furthermore, the Court reduced the fines of Vecchietti and ETF respectively from €200,000 to €180,000 and from €1.2 million to €1.08 million.
To view Community Week, Issue 479; 9 July 2010 in full, Click here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.